11 results for 'judge:"Osterhaus"'.
J. Osterhaus finds that the trial court improperly imposed a restitution order in favor of the burglary victim. The court erred in awarding lost wages for working as an unlicensed cosmetolgoist, as operting as a cosmetologist without a license is illegal. Reversed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Osterhaus, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: 1D2023-1253, Categories: Restitution
J. Osterhaus finds that the circuit court properly ruled for the department of revenue in this corporate tax dispute by determining that certain federal tax mitigation rules that would benefit cellular company Verizon on its 2000 tax return do not apply under Florida law. Affirmed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Osterhaus, Filed On: February 28, 2024, Case #: 1D2022-2094, Categories: Tax
J. Osterhaus finds that the circuit court properly ruled for cellular company Verizon in this tax dispute since the court correctly interpreted statute regarding calculations of income tax deductions. Affirmed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Osterhaus, Filed On: February 28, 2024, Case #: 1D2022-2096, Categories: Tax
J. Osterhaus finds the Florida Department of Revenue improperly denied the final order for a taxpayer’s request for a partial refund of double-paid motor fuel taxes. The taxpayer had paid the tax directly to the supplier and then it was remitted to the department. The department audited the taxpayer and found it had double-paid more than $3.1 million through different channels. The department accepted the second payment directly, and nothing bars refunds mistakenly made. This case is remanded for the issuance of a refund. Reversed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Osterhaus, Filed On: February 14, 2024, Case #: 1D2022-3284, Categories: Tax
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Osterhaus finds that the trial court properly ruled for a web-based company in claims challenging a memo in which the department of health warned local medical marijuana providers against contracting with the website for order hosting. The memo constituted a "rule," and the order hosting company established standing. Affirmed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Osterhaus , Filed On: August 9, 2023, Case #: 1D21-3501, Categories: Jurisdiction, Contract
J. Osterhaus finds that the trial court properly convicted defendant of both grand theft of an automobile and petit theft of tools that had been in the automobile. Double jeopardy had not been violated since the events concerned different circumstances, and the items had been owned by separate victims. Affirmed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Osterhaus, Filed On: June 7, 2023, Case #: 1D22-513, Categories: Theft, Double Jeopardy